Contextualizing the Gospel -Part 2

Neither of these church responses is appropriate, of course.   When a missionary takes the message of Jesus into a completely unreached people group, he must find a way to connect that message to their cultural and world viewpoint.  This is no easy task for the missionary.  Much of the way the life of Christian faith is lived out in a particular culture is not actually essential or biblically derived.

Many churches would make speaking in tongues an essential part of the Christian life, for instance.  While the Bible clearly talks about speaking in tongues, and Pauline letters mention it as a great gift of the Spirit, but no where does the Bible mention it as an essential.  Despite this fact, there are many Christian groups who would take my last statement as a fighting challenge.

It is easy to pick speaking in tongues as an example, but there are myriad ways that we Americanize our faith, and communicating that faith involves a stripping down of the gospel to its essentials.  If we truly believe that this is the word and will of God, then our cultural baggage is nothing but Astroturf lining the best of fairways.  The message of Jesus doesn’t need our cultural additions.

We cannot help adding these additions, though.  When any culture accepts the Christian faith, it makes it its own.  Korean Christians have a practice of prayer whereby all the members of the church pray out loud simultaneously.  It creates quite a holy ruckus.  It is good.  It is holy.  It also sounds weird to our western ears.  It is a Korean expression of Christian faith.  But Koreans can not hope to force Americans to accept their prayer style as necessary to being Christian.

This seems obvious, yet the Church in America sits as the American culture has been radically redefined over the last 40 years, hoping to contextualize American culture to our faith, instead of doing what any missionary would do and contextualize faith.  I think that part of the reason has to do with a general assumption that America is a Christian country.  Many people seem to subconsciously equate Americanism and Christianity.  The klaxon call is to not let the sinners take over our culture, and fight a cultural war to prevent this.  Of course, it is important to encourage our government to support healthy morality, but this is not a battle that the American Church should make our front line.

Instead, we should be seeking to contextualize our faith into the changing landscape of cultural America.  We should be finding out where people meet, what people want and need, the cultural touchpoints they have.  Once we do that, we can use these areas as introduction points, our cultural carriers of the message of Jesus.  This will be difficult for the Church to do, but it is absolutely necessary. -Ryan

copyright-notice

Contextualizing the Gospel -Part 2

Neither of these church responses is appropriate, of course.   When a missionary takes the message of Jesus into a completely unreached people group, he must find a way to connect that message to their cultural and world viewpoint.  This is no easy task for the missionary.  Much of the way the life of Christian faith is lived out in a particular culture is not actually essential or biblically derived.

Many churches would make speaking in tongues an essential part of the Christian life, for instance.  While the Bible clearly talks about speaking in tongues, and Pauline letters mention it as a great gift of the Spirit, but no where does the Bible mention it as an essential.  Despite this fact, there are many Christian groups who would take my last statement as a fighting challenge.

It is easy to pick speaking in tongues as an example, but there are myriad ways that we Americanize our faith, and communicating that faith involves a stripping down of the gospel to its essentials.  If we truly believe that this is the word and will of God, then our cultural baggage is nothing but Astroturf lining the best of fairways.  The message of Jesus doesn’t need our cultural additions.

We cannot help adding these additions, though.  When any culture accepts the Christian faith, it makes it its own.  Korean Christians have a practice of prayer whereby all the members of the church pray out loud simultaneously.  It creates quite a holy ruckus.  It is good.  It is holy.  It also sounds weird to our western ears.  It is a Korean expression of Christian faith.  But Koreans can not hope to force Americans to accept their prayer style as necessary to being Christian.

This seems obvious, yet the Church in America sits as the American culture has been radically redefined over the last 40 years, hoping to contextualize American culture to our faith, instead of doing what any missionary would do and contextualize faith.  I think that part of the reason has to do with a general assumption that America is a Christian country.  Many people seem to subconsciously equate Americanism and Christianity.  The klaxon call is to not let the sinners take over our culture, and fight a cultural war to prevent this.  Of course, it is important to encourage our government to support healthy morality, but this is not a battle that the American Church should make our front line.

Instead, we should be seeking to contextualize our faith into the changing landscape of cultural America.  We should be finding out where people meet, what people want and need, the cultural touchpoints they have.  Once we do that, we can use these areas as introduction points, our cultural carriers of the message of Jesus.  This will be difficult for the Church to do, but it is absolutely necessary. -Ryan

copyright-notice

Contextualizing the Gospel -Part 1

One of my most-discussed topics on this blog has been the life of faith in a post-Christian America.  The most read section of this blog is the Church Tech section, about the use of communications technology within the church.  These two topics are not disconnected, though.  Any new culture necessitates new ways of communicating the message of Jesus.  Radical societal changes create a new culture.  Thus, the Christian message must be re-contextualized.  In order to understand the methods of communicating that, we must first truly understand the basic reasons behind this.

The difficulty is that the Church in America has largely missed addressing the massive changes in culture over the last 40+ years.  In some ways, the Church has insulated herself against these changes.  While the community is seen as increasingly ungodly, many Christians have banded together into Christian ghettos.  Over time the Christian culture has changed independently of the culture around it.

A great example of this has been seen in worship.  In the 1970’s the Church in America started to adopt the musical styles of the larger American culture.  In a relatively short amount of time the Church changed its worship style from the hymns of the last thousand plus years to the more modern praise songs.

A natural result of a more exuberant worship style was increased movement in worship and raising of hands.  Churches needed a way for its members to see the words of these new songs.  Songs were being frequently added to the musical canon, and older ones were being removed.  This was not conducive to printed hymnals.

As technology increased and prices dropped accordingly, churches began to display these words with overhead/slide projectors and more recently, video projectors.  So, visiting the average church in America on a Sunday morning, one will find a group of people clapping along to the music as they sway and sing at a digital projection of words and video.

This isn’t greatly different from a rock concert, but people staring at projectors with one hand raised as they awkwardly shuffle their feet is its own beast for sure.  While this has evolved in Church, the larger outside culture has grown into a greater variety of musical expressions depending on genre.  A rap concert might have a crowd packed tightly with people jumping and arms swaying, while hardcore and punk fans are moshing in the pit up front.  Although it has been modernized, Church music still looks and sounds very different than its secular counterparts, but for new reasons.  While the culture evolved, church culture has evolved too, but separately.

A second response to the changing culture has been for the Church to cling to the methods of the past, refusing any changes at all.  Many of these churches look to the glory days of the 1950’s when the sanctuary was packed.  Either because of political forces within the church resisting, or as part of a poor growth strategy (similar to keeping your Member’s-only jackets in hopes it’ll come back in style), these churches have tried to keep everything museum-quality.

In these churches one can find the only places in America with pews and pipe-organs.  Deep Maroon carpets and green pew hymnals sit locked eternally in 1962.  The pride of these churches is their history and they give even vocal approval of the fact that they haven’t evolved, as if the gospel itself is encapsulated by the accumulation of dust.   -Ryan

copyright-notice

Contextualizing the Gospel -Part 1

One of my most-discussed topics on this blog has been the life of faith in a post-Christian America.  The most read section of this blog is this section, about the use of communications technology within the church.  These two topics are not disconnected, though.  Any new culture necessitates new ways of communicating the message of Jesus.  Radical societal changes create a new culture.  Thus, the Christian message must be re-contextualized.  In order to understand the methods of communicating that, we must first truly understand the basic reasons behind this.

The difficulty is that the Church in America has largely missed addressing the massive changes in culture over the last 40+ years.  In some ways, the Church has insulated herself against these changes.  While the community is seen as increasingly ungodly, many Christians have banded together into Christian ghettos.  Over time the Christian culture has changed independently of the culture around it.

A great example of this has been seen in worship.  In the 1970’s the Church in America started to adopt the musical styles of the larger American culture.  In a relatively short amount of time the Church changed its worship style from the hymns of the last thousand plus years to the more modern praise songs.

A natural result of a more exuberant worship style was increased movement in worship and raising of hands.  Churches needed a way for its members to see the words of these new songs.  Songs were being frequently added to the musical canon, and older ones were being removed.  This was not conducive to printed hymnals.

As technology increased and prices dropped accordingly, churches began to display these words with overhead/slide projectors and more recently, video projectors.  So, visiting the average church in America on a Sunday morning, one will find a group of people clapping along to the music as they sway and sing at a digital projection of words and video.

This isn’t greatly different from a rock concert, but people staring at projectors with one hand raised as they awkwardly shuffle their feet is its own beast for sure.  While this has evolved in Church, the larger outside culture has grown into a greater variety of musical expressions depending on genre.  A rap concert might have a crowd packed tightly with people jumping and arms swaying, while hardcore and punk fans are moshing in the pit up front.  Although it has been modernized, Church music still looks and sounds very different than its secular counterparts, but for new reasons.  While the culture evolved, church culture has evolved too, but separately.

A second response to the changing culture has been for the Church to cling to the methods of the past, refusing any changes at all.  Many of these churches look to the glory days of the 1950’s when the sanctuary was packed.  Either because of political forces within the church resisting, or as part of a poor growth strategy (similar to keeping your Member’s-only jackets in hopes it’ll come back in style), these churches have tried to keep everything museum-quality.

In these churches one can find the only places in America with pews and pipe-organs.  Deep Maroon carpets and green pew hymnals sit locked eternally in 1962.  The pride of these churches is their history and they give even vocal approval of the fact that they haven’t evolved, as if the gospel itself is encapsulated by the accumulation of dust.   -Ryan

copyright-notice

Fun Facts

It's a FactIt has become quite an Internet fad to list interesting facts on websites.  Unfortunately, many times these facts are totally unverified and confusing.  Therefore, we will present here facts that have passed our rigorous fact-checking process, as well as those which are particularly helpful and informative.  These are facts that you can take to the bank!

Today’s It’s a Fact:

Everyone is familiar with the Chihuahua, the national dog of Mexico. What many people do not know is that, like all breeds, the Chihuahua has a long pedigree.  The Chihuahua was actually one of the earliest settlers of Mexico, when it was brought by the first conquistadors on their ships.  The Chihuahua was a perfect choice for the Spanish explorers, who used them both for companionship on board ship as well as to hunt any small rodents on board.  The Chihuahua wasn’t a big eater, saving resources, and though diminutive, was (and still is) quite bold for its size.

The history of the Chihuahua goes back even further, though.  The Chihuahua came to Spain as one of Marco Polo’s discoveries from China.  The Chihuahua was a part of the Chinese Emperor’s court, where it was used as a lap dog and a source of imperial entertainment.  Its name comes from the Chinese “chi,” meaning “to grasp in the hands,” and “hua-hua,” which means “an irritating noise.”  The Chihuahua was a dog reserved only for the ruling class in China, and it is reported that Marco Polo returned with six mated pairs, given to him by members of the Chinese royal court.

Today, the Chihuahua is a national symbol of Mexico.  It is so revered that Mexico even came to name one of its own states after the beloved dog.  We love them.  We laugh at them.  But few know the amazing history of this wonderful breed.   -Ryan

copyright-notice

Communicating the Gospel in a Post-Christian World

tractsI’ve had a really interesting mix of circumstances over the last week, which have really led me to think about the way Christianity interacts with the pluralism of this Post-Christian world.  First, I met with a group of close friends over lunch to discuss faith, politics, and life in general.  The three of us are very similar in many ways.  We laugh at the same ridiculous jokes.  We are all smart and well read.  We all believe in living life with a strict sense of morality.  However, we come from a diverse theological spectrum.  One of us is a devout Catholic, one a Protestant pastor (me), and one an agnostic in a “crisis of faith” (his words).

The interesting thing is that we can sit and deeply debate very difficult issues of faith, theology, and human existence.  We discussed and debated for nearly 3 hours.  It was so refreshing to me to talk deeply about these issues without someone feeling threatened that others not agreeing would somehow cause him injury.

As I was meeting with my friends, my wife called to inform me that our friend from Taiwan had committed his life to Jesus.  Peichi led an English class at church in the spring for university foreign exchange students.  This program was largely based on building relationships between these students and American families within our church.  We never gave a “come to Jesus” message.  We never even led a Bible study, just food and conversation.  But several students have become Christians lately, quite a few consider our church their home (even though they don’t understand even half of the sermon), and we baptized one this Sunday.

Peichi and I have also started to really get to know some of our neighbors.  One family that we have become friends with in particular is our downstairs neighbors from Iran.  We each go to the other’s apartments, and we celebrate important events together.  They are of the Bahai faith, and that is a very important part of their lives.  They are not only some of the nicest people we know, but both my wife and I consider them to be dear friends.

In each of these situations lately, I have interacted in situations where I wasn’t reaching down to save the heathen masses.  People didn’t approach me initially for answers to their deep and burning questions.  In fact, the very situations required that I faced these people as equals, and tried to be Christ-like and loving in a natural way.

I think that the future of a post-Christian America is going to force God’s people to stop assuming that those outside of the Church are merely ignorant and groping for hope.  Being a Christian necessitates believing that we are in possession of the Truth.  Religious pluralism and syncretism aren’t luxuries that we have.  But at the same time, we need not be afraid or ignorant that there are other systems and faiths who honestly believe that they are in possession of the same Truth we are.  Christian ghettos and Christian arrogance will do nothing in this post-modern climate.  We cannot put our heads in the sand of Christian culture.  Nor can we wait for the lost masses to come banging on our door.  Neither strategy will show the world a Church that has anything to add to this dialogue.   -Ryan

copyright-notice

Fun Facts

It's a Fact

It has become quite an Internet fad to list interesting facts on websites.  Unfortunately, many times these facts are totally unverified and confusing.  Therefore, we will present here facts that have passed our rigorous fact-checking process, as well as those which are particularly helpful and informative.  These are facts that you can take to the bank!

Today’s It’s a Fact:

In the UK, not only do cars drive on the wrong side of the road, but many people in the US don’t know that because of this, cars also use their turn signals exactly opposite of those in the United States.  A car turning right will use their left-hand signal, and vice-versa.  Many Americans don’t realize this when in the UK, which is why Americans get in three times as many car accidents as Brits when visiting there.

Tell everyone you know.  It may save lives.

Going Digital

I’ve been watching the slew of PSA’s and “news” stories about the life-altering switch to Digital TV this Friday, and doing a lot of thinking.  Today, I heard on the radio that state lawmakers are “concerned” that too many households have not yet gotten their digital converter boxes, and are scrambling to figure out how to help.  I sat incredulous.

A year ago, everyone was scrambling to get the public educated and prepared for the February 17th, 2009 switch.  February came and went, with the Federal government realizing that this was too much for the public to handle.  A Popular Mechanics article detailed the government fears, and estimated that the government had spend $1.5 billion on helping the public make this switch.  This includes 33 million vouchers for essentially free converter boxes.  This was as of May, 2008.  These numbers have most assuredly risen substantially since then.

All of this seems so nice of the government.  We are so blessed to live in a land where our right to sit on our rears watching morally and intellectually degrading junk is supported by $1.5 billion in tax dollars.  This is especially generous of Uncle Sam…er….me, the taxpayer, considering our multi-trillion dollar deficit.

It has been said that the people often get the government they deserve.  Well, if indeed our priority is in having TV over a functioning and solvent government, then indeed we have succeeded.  But, if that is the case our society isn’t worth fixing.

But for a long time I have been bothered by more than the financial aspects of this.  We have had two years of bouncing cartoons explaining the Digital TV change.  Yet, mark my words, there will be people who on Friday will wake up and start screaming that they don’t know what happened.  They will shower, head out the door, and pick up a converter box at Best Buy before going home.  If the government had done nothing but allow the newspapers and TV news to report on it, the same thing would have happened.  The TV networks would have done their best to make sure everyone knows.  More people might have not been ready, but those people would quickly figure out what to do to fix their problem.

These same households that spend hundreds of dollars on X-boxes for their children would have gone out and bought $100 converter boxes, and if they couldn’t afford it, they would have done without for a couple months.  If people value their TV, they would have figured out a way.

I realize that had the government not done what they did, there would have been a whole lot of complaining.  In World War 2 people went without buying new tires or panty hose for years, and now we need the government to buy us TV gear, all the while Washington is boring from our grand children’s pocketbooks.

I wish our people deserved better.  Right now, I’m not so sure.

-Ryan

copyright-notice