According to Miriam-Webster one of the hallmarks of what defines journalism is “writing characterized by a direct presentation of facts or description of events without an attempt at interpretation.” The framers of the Constitution of the United States understood that this was a key aspect of a free society. This was inherent in the protection of the fourth estate written into the First Amendment.
Bloggers and Foxy News types are always complaining that this has been forgotten, but sometimes we need a refresher course with some easily digestible facts.
Case in point
A recent Hot Air link from the Los Angeles Times gave a snapshot into statistics regarding the current immigration controversy in Arizona. The Article by Teresa Watanabe, Immigration now a top concern among Latinos, poll shows, reported that the poll “of 504 Latinos” revealed that immigration was now the main concern of American Latinos, spurred by the new Arizona immigration law that they overwhelmingly opposed.
The article further stated that this issue would “galvanize Latinos of all political stripes into voting in November,” and that the majority would only vote for candidates supporting an “immigration overhaul.”
All of this may be quite accurate. But as usual, there is a lot written between the lines of this article.
To her credit, at least the author lists the sponsors of the survey, the Hispanic Federation and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). What Ms. Watanabe leaves out is that both the Hispanic Federation and LULUC have a very clearly presented agenda that is perhaps important in determining the validity of any survey that they undertake on the matter of immigration.
The Hispanic Federation, whose mission is, “To serve our community by building and supporting Latino institutions,” has recently put out a statement both condemning protection of the border and demanding “comprehensive immigration reform” as the only fix for our immigration problem. Keep in mind that “comprehensive immigration reform” is one of those liberal talking-point catchphrases for amnesty for illegal aliens. “We need comprehensive immigration reform so hard working undocumented immigrants, who do the jobs other Americans won’t do, can finally come out of the shadows,” I believe is the officially sanctioned wording these days. When any of these phrases are used, it becomes pretty clear which side of the issue the author is leaning toward.
On its homepage, the Federation refers to the survey in question, and gives the community’s reaction to the “Racial profiling law.” One could not by any stretch of the imagination consider the Hispanic Federation an impartial party in this issue.
LULAC is far more militant as an organization. Their website has an open call to boycott Arizona, although they trickily word it as, “boycott Senate bill 1070,” superimposed over the state outline. I guess this prevents anyone from saying they actually called for a state boycott. How clever. I guess they also fail as a disinterested survey party.
One would expect better results from someone with a USC degree like Teresa Watanabe. But oh, wait! Her Facebook page lists her as a fan of Reform Immigration For America. Their agenda is made perfectly clear.
So to recap, Thoroughly researched article—fail; Objective writing—fail; impartial survey—fail; LA Times writer trying to uncover truth wherever it may be found—massive fail. This is no surprise. In a recent survey conducted by RyanShinn.com, the Los Angeles times was found to be unreliable by 92% of respondents.
Why is this so bad?
Thomas Jefferson said that, “Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.” He wasn’t the only one with this sentiment. The press was understood as being the main instrument to counter inevitable propaganda intended to control and enslave a free society.
Dictators have also long known this. Vladimir Lenin stated this principle quite nicely. “The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.”
It comes as no secret to anyone paying attention that the American main-stream press has largely abandoned the value of a free press in favor of acting more as a mouthpiece for propaganda that more easily fits their world-view. But this fact needs to continually be brought back to our collective consciousness, lest we forget. -Ryan