<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Free Information Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanshinn.com/2009/10/08/the-free-information-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanshinn.com/2009/10/08/the-free-information-age/</link>
	<description>Let's blog about it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ryanshinn.com/2009/10/08/the-free-information-age/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanshinn.com/?p=460#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I am not sure that I understand what you are saying here...please clarify, if you would.  

I think that the Right is currently pretty convinced of conspiracies as well.  All you have to do is listen to talk radio (which I do, and like actually) for an hour or so.  

The &quot;skepticism of information&quot; that I am discussing is not really tied to the 9/11 and Bush Derangement Syndrome, but actually an approach to information in general.  

To illustrate, think of the last &quot;just thought you should know...&quot; type of email you got.  I bet you either a- instantly trashed it, or b- went to snopes.com to verify.  Right?  

I recently heard a radio commercial that advertised some weight loss pill (I think it was weight loss).  It said &quot;A free trial of _____ has been extended to just the listeners of &#039;this station&#039; for the first 100 callers.&#039;&quot;  I immediately thought, &quot;I wonder what other stations this commercial plays on?&quot; and &quot;I bet I would still get it if I was the 103rd caller.&quot;  

That is the skepticism I am addressing.  In other news, I&#039;ve lost 15 pounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure that I understand what you are saying here&#8230;please clarify, if you would.  </p>
<p>I think that the Right is currently pretty convinced of conspiracies as well.  All you have to do is listen to talk radio (which I do, and like actually) for an hour or so.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;skepticism of information&#8221; that I am discussing is not really tied to the 9/11 and Bush Derangement Syndrome, but actually an approach to information in general.  </p>
<p>To illustrate, think of the last &#8220;just thought you should know&#8230;&#8221; type of email you got.  I bet you either a- instantly trashed it, or b- went to snopes.com to verify.  Right?  </p>
<p>I recently heard a radio commercial that advertised some weight loss pill (I think it was weight loss).  It said &#8220;A free trial of _____ has been extended to just the listeners of &#8216;this station&#8217; for the first 100 callers.&#8217;&#8221;  I immediately thought, &#8220;I wonder what other stations this commercial plays on?&#8221; and &#8220;I bet I would still get it if I was the 103rd caller.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That is the skepticism I am addressing.  In other news, I&#8217;ve lost 15 pounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ryanshinn.com/2009/10/08/the-free-information-age/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanshinn.com/?p=460#comment-130</guid>
		<description>I would say &quot;skepticism of information, and an assumption of conspiracies&quot; only for those people on the other side from yourself. I wish people would apply that same criticism to, oh, say... the person they voted for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say &#8220;skepticism of information, and an assumption of conspiracies&#8221; only for those people on the other side from yourself. I wish people would apply that same criticism to, oh, say&#8230; the person they voted for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
